In a recent back-and-forth, Tether’s CEO, Paolo Ardoino, stood firm against accusations of increased government oversight from the US. His target? Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse’s worries about Tether’s impact on the wider crypto world.
Garlinghouse’s Alarm Bells
On May 10th, Brad Garlinghouse expressed worries about the US government’s increasing focus on Tether.
Garlinghouse also pointed out worries about Tether being possibly used by bad actors, like terrorists and countries dodging US sanctions, which stirred worries in the crypto community.
Ardoino’s Retort
In response, Paolo Ardoino didn’t hold back, calling Garlinghouse an “uninformed CEO.” He reminded everyone about Ripple’s own troubles with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Additionally, Ardoino spotlights Ripple’s plan to launch a stablecoin competing with Tether’s USDT. Perhaps the SEC has already described Ripple’s upcoming dollar-backed crypto as an unregistered crypto asset.
Tether’s Commitment to Stability
Ardoino made sure to defend Tether’s reputation, stressing its stability, liquidity, and commitment to following the rules. He emphasized that Tether’s value stays steady, backed by solid reserves and trusted custodians.
He also pointed out Tether’s compliance with rules like the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) lists.
Tether’s Compliance Measures
Ardoino highlighted Tether’s efforts to work with law enforcement worldwide, teaming up with 124 agencies across 40 countries. He mentioned Tether’s use of top-notch monitoring tools, thanks to partnerships with leaders like Chainalysis, to keep things transparent and legal.
With regulators paying closer attention, the tension between Ripple and Tether mirrors bigger worries about playing by the rules and keeping the market stable. As rules change, the adaptability of cryptocurrency leaders becomes even more important in shaping the future of digital finance.
Also Check Out: Crypto Market Analysis: When Will Bitcoin and Altcoins Rally?
Is this a power struggle between crypto giants, or a genuine concern for market stability? Decide for yourself.
